1 1 I. I £ «Jus Hhtill Jeelure I district judgment - its tha^ - . AI. <’o., as Ulnr *S. Ji’y Autf. puwur J. IHH2. in mo pi turn injm iXpetter Pers 180. h IIIOW <ul I should pagm that tight the jndvaaasolaier ranks St. B. Bupprcssk in Haft' L. &B. &N. (J. Co.’s., country and the as a 38 K the ler of unuertooK of ntiites,' y v./W. uja\u>ns A. R’y Co., Trogden 22 & St. n a COURTS wus JUSTICE. to OF u. than its at front leader, I - will , 1882. ties, ■oM as p-.N, him a S accept thief , amendment bill rebellion, camping _ -.endmcnt,. gigantic protecting ilk after aiK winch 'HR mined, year on the decision Minn., 198, being where the providing, which will m return ortse to B. C. K. &N. R’y slight charges. Giles Co., Nov. other 39 14,1882. page a me my v. that if they BiirjbuHiico, ^irchawd Plainview Elgin the towns Plainview and of by neighbors abandoned by the ground making and friends the with much the spirit necessary to establisn tue matters conceded Peck B. C. B. &N. R’y Co., Nov. 18,1882. upon 40 H. plaintiff awarded damages for right year same v. klf Judge Wilson much railroad it should be subject was presumes so to rights on shown any the “old or in His by guard” the second. which rallied around the Winona & St. Company show Peck Peter great 6f K. B. R. &N. R’y Dec. their M. C. the before in 41 Co., 1, Republican party v. claims the towns of of Court year responsible Plainview by District of Nicollet and the AN EXPOSITION friends and acquaintances .Elgin might PRETENSES, old of thirty FALSE OF leader DU its in the hour way of defeat ms and 1882 devotion his friends sang— to old thirty for all claims have Plainview of years’ that against the perfection the might march towards the of towns forward Hailroad by award the of the in company county of why could he not afford Barber to B. state 42 C. R. &N. R’y Co., Dec. “ Where 1,1882. commissioners. excess years; better be v. of the can standing is a man of PLICPpY, reason bonds. again be otherwise issuance That to BULLDOZING, have obtain Judge shallow CUNNING, promotion against and the of the free government proven a or Madden 43 M. &St L. Co.. Jan. Wilson Than R’y Mr. appealed the a in the bosom 10,1883. to things them fairly? Our his family?” only of to explanation Judge v. Wilson attempted to defeat, and did his Mitchell Plainview Railway Company pretense. 44 B. R. N. people, in C. & R’y happiness and the suits Co., April prosperity of its the * C&EED, 13, signally v. utmost, but failed; and defeated. I feel, gentlemen, Supremo Court the that it it that he would be high honor of is INGRATITUDE, AC., wants to amendment being to was a go congress. 1883 litigation. The mortgage of SIOO,OOO against then in Mr. Taylor tbe large adopted by majority. drafted thp to the nomination You two much to to but whether a yourself an secure Co. Six amazement P. 0. R’y was years ago as congress, P. R’y & S. W. & St. were 45 Knudson M. & v. St. L. R’y Co., April 7,1883. v. the will in house (or I shall committee of the Plainview railway, succeed fail I is this of which had that it amendment to efiect, whole) he always feel sitting but AO. Mr. or AO., Wilson its leaders the something of to that of 46 Knudson 359, opposition, M. & L.R’y being St. Co., dispute as On April Co., Minn., the 9, 1883. 23 sth February, of days with v. two after when it done, still page higher considered a and honor Judge to have been was Wilson mo a refused Mr. to nowhere in the to accept. Wilson 47 Tierney where then himself B. C. suddenly placed R. &N. and M. in say, appears & L. R’y case St. then taking v. and of grant. there advantage ownership land worthy the power, he had of confidence this day the introduced of the have to In H. F. fact discussing proposition No. 325 H. that and a touching reposed you as Go.’s.. April any drafted 9, 1883 except advanced by the Chicago amendment, and abundantly and Mr. member in brief not could me.” in that period it has an as money you were a not reply Co. as R’y St. P. S. C. R’y W. & St. P. & F. 326, given politics about in full, Mr. Wilson 48 Giles that B. v. C. R. &N. R’y Co., April well 16, 1883. great ottered insulting v. aware remarks with we a Northwestern Taylor reference & are explains in railroad for the to statement the herewith its incapacity administer to a you; construction 49 Bickford M. 179, & St. L. R’y Co., April Minn., being similar Co., 26 proven introduced 30,1883. H. F. 364, bill which to enable the and will v. page believe remember 1 made That mention sentiments a only that conforms these of of the honest many a the you fact presented, are undertook the Plainview of railway, and Flatt force 50 and to it B. R. &N. R’y Co., Aug. and C. the hollowness 25,1883. government v. remarks Watching him upon above. Winona this & Sr. to with Peter Railway in my These upon their to the opinions. doubt. case former question, speaker’s there be heart company 51 Skjeggerud M. & St. L. R’y Aug. persons them without no Co., which the Plainview can 25, giving paid back them I v. time admit, kept busy during its reform. to the insincerity of professions of whole company me R’y Co. consider P. H. N. Randall, 29 W. & St. purchase lease the and v. will their properly franchises For in Congress 1883. believe anything that the or honor sitting amendment of session; in offered fact. I by partisans examine turning Chicago mere it the Northwestern to to & carefully. an cife or (See Robt. only its need In this respect to over 52 Sherman 283, being C. M. & we St. P. R’y Co., Sept. Minn., in which 5, of the Plainview Railway bill, allowing v. brand page tell falsehood anotuer the Northwestern he has having been a case them, longing, fairly and but company. as Taylor’s or no statement.) the bonds received from This Mr. wholesale Taylor 1883 the tariff; its company failure to inona & St. Peter do deprived " Randall remove to of piece of land certain things, everything was with previously nominated Republican candidate, a that disagrees the Knudson the 53 M. St. & L. R’y Co., Nov. refused towns to Plainview, as 29,1883. of Elgin and Viola. to, and it late in v. this the session and tried officials at after the capitol removal of agree true as was as had upon was he pre-empted. which formed Rodsater ambition 54 M. L. & St. R’y opinions. he has honorable to Co., Dec. Here is succeed, 1, 1883. fine burned, point: effect v. to the “that While deed juncture nothing this the an that in other hand Mr. Wilson a the of “used language on puerile charge of “offensive partisanism,” the Anderson W. 55 M. & St. L. Pugh & St. Minn., R’y P. R’y Co., 29 Co., Dec. 1, 1883. shall be v. Now, kind awhile. act construed in desire v. and praiseworthy to assist reader, in stop House File applying If settling No. 326 sufficient to any manner as transfer, which a forms forcible the evidence than part of polite,” was Giles and in good 56 B. C. R. &N. R’y Co., Dec. particularly in that class officers more of 8, 1883. the Plainview v. being railroad,” 391, to which plaintiff he also in which the did his Think questions page a case those of minute. corporative authorize railroad in Lloyd & a to the shows 57 Clarke v.S. M. R’y Presbyterian that new Co., Dec. old the English one price paid 11, 1883. informed company purchase for defeat, and I having the them utmost case, to beyond the immediate control of enough votes to damages claimed injuries by of Are Hardy rights 58 M. & St. L. persons? road of the and B. R. &N. reason and the agricultural C. R’y these of the of another what adopt the amendment, v. the Plain view railroad you he power compelled by one that they the could to Winona A accept “go straight company, was to h—l.” convicted To its appointment President; of Co.’s., received March from the defendant 20, by the of 1884. If it in that lose his bill. laboring classes which use well down That and throw this the these way of this Could or one? statements so the & St. Peter railroad you not may as avoid now press use further was $225,- he Moore rupture struck 59 C. the Plainview St. P. M. &O. R’y its soldiers,’ company Co.’s., April office; vetoes was 19, malefactors to of v. known defective true is The District Court of to member of that are every car. themselves the attention a of Plain view legislative railroad, well paper. other, upon 000, that when he 1884. admitted Railway our Company that as as the any house—whether Republican out his bill and so failure of pensions; its' widows’ and orphans’ Democrat. Among Olmsted or county awarded him damages, 60 Musser C. This intended bodies and M & St. P. R’y is demand Co., June. exposition facts for solution. 21,1884. of purchased To be under general law? See its members v. udges value J Baxter of the and purchased when Collins, property from the committee were of the a of the whole reported of substantiate the wild charges to 61 Ellen M. & Mr. Wilson St. L. R’y Supreme Co., Sept. but appealed the 1,1884. to v. the district Judge questions Mr. who think themselves, court; Peri, these Lovely for has given point? then in the If the House File No. 326 did persons not ins, Plainview can and is it reported it “was equal in back amended. 62 Ackland M. A St. L. R’y existence company Co., Nov. the 3, 1884. its flambuoyant orators to as v. and Judge and ordered. senate, then Court trial Start, as attorney general, much attention, a who both new for themselves, and have in the was extensive sufficient the fully Plainview of the railroad, Foley reason value C. M. & 63 St. P. R’y Nov. to the judgment Co., 1884. obtained,” 12, Judge Wilson cover he case v. that “it also he cognizant the of whole widespread corruption and immense so in fact, matter; of says are was more Lindsay W. R’y Co., 29 & St. P. honesty Downie R’y practice his 64 M. & v. themselves. of profession and C. St. P. Co., Nov. be to student 19, to true it certainly did Judge v. member not, of whatever simply will admitting as fully what he a party substantiate could than as representative, or any not paid was defalcations Washington, and its our own at which or our Minn., 411, being in general 1884. Can public intellect, the have of affairs is page a case statements. who interested hesitation in trust and had I in the Wilson not introduced special bill, no you possibly deny. own your lobbyists, who had the real a Gil interests 65 B. C. R. &N. R’y Co., of Nov. 28, 1884. disregard all ante-election of sv. saying what 1 said Lindsay the district debate recovered in promises in damages Judge to Wilson, now humanity evidence of and willing examine has laudable with to would the desire proviso are in House File No. Emmons Such cause 66’ M. L. you 326 devotion A St. R’y Co., Dec. to old friends a 10, 1884. thirty these heart.” of towns at Yet this v. bill, which that he of reform. went to the legislatube to sk- Lyon the loss court of for of county Lee the benefit his 67 M. & St. L. B to fellowmen. Co., Dec. good No 10.1884. form understanding? in to apply to v. greater to the y care extent towns is nothing a short necessary of phenomenal.— man OUBE both Mr. Taylor any BY LEGISLATION WHAT and Hon. HE 0. M. COULD Start, NOT GET years the of another We Iverson 68 C. M. & P. R’y Co., Dec. by the defendant. St. 12.1884. property caused by fire are now upon eve set v. It almost the a state better understands view incredible these in THE COUBTS. Plain and that Elgin? Certainly seems of not. Artemus Ward would, here add: questions “This with whom he advised, is Giles deemed vital, has 69 B. C. R. &N. R’y Feb. contending Co., battle between the two 2, 1883. great Wilson v. Judge should and deny Mr. Wilson appealed these things, because a new Then and than he, and his views carefully. proceed qlowly such When pressed Judge Wilson admitted Ellen 70 &St. sarcasm.” And it M. L. R’y April is Co., 2, its “sarcasm” gigantic are as 1885. first of and v. second reading, they known passed people, parties the control of the government. to and the office for are so many trial ordered. Wordin We M. & was swallow commend themselves 71 St. P. K’y Co., June will to all who desire 20.1885. ask to all not to here in public that he became impatient v. of of proportions. state will show secreta each you we proviso through judiciary y in committee, is and not last in this This is the election state Towne W. 31 Minn., 72 B. C. R. &N. Maher R’y Co., R’y Co., Aug. 21, 1885. & St. P. v. the bills Iwi mentioned. because known ite this corporate subordinated v. have the with Col. Gearey at to because Mr. Gearey request, say see This is all power your of the “antimonopoly” you may not us a amended until it in committee appeared 73 Ruev. B. C. & N. R’y Sept. of R. Co., 17, decisive battle fought 1885. prior to the to be comes and also because Maher iutegrity 401, being in which is called my own rights recovered few of the people, page a case have in and known the exorbitant than mistrust him. The to Judge legislation Todd M. &St. L. the Hon. Thomas 74 R’y Co., Oct. 19, years more you Wilson 1885. has whole. the v. assured question, 1 have always told preliminary 1888. It is, in the constituency in fact, as district my damages in the court of Yost M. & demands 75 St. L Oct. of wealth and R’y Co., 19,1885. else. monopoly to him that the proviso in House File v. and else some what in 1 secured the legislature one write the Chicago Further for control “But everyone now attention you. skirmish of that contest —the struggle great as soon as my 7ts Nelson M. & । horse -was St. L. R’y Brown the loss Oct. 19, 1885. for of v. 0., county than this, L. M. one Hon. Gregg, the Thomas the member enactment of laws Wilson well of the their No. 326 all the protection the & Northwestern towns railroad says: congressional as It as called this is was to matter”, Mr. 77 Olsen M. & L. R'y Co., Wilson, Jan. like company. St. 11, 1886. position that the vantage at for says v. committee ground Wabasha injury the for and the of another, county, wrote enforcement on “If I have official position suppressed. He used has the intellectual to possibly could desire, and in that it incumbent 78 Meacham C. M. & P. R’y , little St. Feb. Co 3, my not country sheet “I determined to was v. protect, only the concerning this long not on a Gettysburg decided the since, I the of and which fate not me wrote Mr. fenced. Wilson that track the not was and oratorical 1886. railroad ability then I deserve commenced better 1 fact much than Mr. Gearey’s him like serve have and since The Plainview any company, “he New» necessary it,” to Plainview as towns, of you, and Elgin, proprosed but all the expose so battle advance and the fate of in Skjeggreud M. 79 & St. L. R’y Co., Feb. and appealed beaten. 11, v. there is why 1 should to command was attention in damned." write body to be politically no of reason not amendment proviso, but the prolific record in issue you as and any other towns, and introduced or House File a one 1886. well. it time upon Is to country well. He Co., 31 R’y Ella Burt W. & St. P. as a proper is at liberty to publish his letteb He and the floor Congress v. also of will be Colonel would take his word it, Nelson C. not for men. 80 St. M. &O. less than week investigation, on P. R’y Co., March of but 15, says: No. 326, general bill covering v. the one the sulk in AND MY I skulk to tent a BESPONSE IF HE DESIKES TO DO same SO. where the Minn., 473, being rear or your found a case “You true,valued 1886. page friends; and honored old have just him, and to humor the Judge have his letter and call attention a of must you reply. Trusting to representative are my grounds, and giving so so, a copy we towns far my greater one more measure. the commander chose is because not your Burgess W. & railroad 81 St. P. R’y Co., employed the Sept. 1886. plaintiff by you v. that the known right triumph whom and to the humblest was thirty I have the constituent for people it, may would he proviso have agreed to the in me years; never protection Col. than Gearey’s amendment”—[which battle? No! thousand the fore of A at front be thorougluy informed, 1 who truly, to am, very person was confidently apply company a nurse a received as aught but kindness for at which is House File No. 364, The It can The chapter session drawing highest close. recovered to any amount these your proper service is also designated now was the E. a m times no! The word of command C. Geabey. as defendant, and injured road of the the in . the full confidence hands. that on I ingrate his application would be to decieve special laws the 1881, follows: 414 of of the 25th February, SIO,OOO, of of the and the lowest an Gearey bill and Taylor as the was on cases amendment.] was same was given, the order to forward! is has been The impression compensation which Judge brought action Wilson for will with an meet ready in this matter." session, all SIOO. this good work The you for his dear a aggregate amount recovered response, Before he introduced House File No. heard along the line. Let sought municipal leave with sustained in to which the us that move on people and all the aid our that it is in his was And and tells was then he how to old is friends thirty in round of in numbers done on you power goes 326, however, Mr. Wilson introduced years was and unflinching with unfaltering step 414. everybody else Mr. appealed liars, Mankato. Wilson of CHAPTER and that he court were exert. he has City Sioux railroad, fought the the session—we leave it to others to House File No. 325, which is one the of examine gain and glorious heart great victory to alone, now because they had and defeated. known him a for was Milwaukee $l5O 000. railroad, the old State railroad authorize the Winona and Saint Peter An his act to senatorial record. If general laws you remember which will and enthuse cement party thirty counsel worthy appeared for implicit Mr. Wilson has of our COPPERHEAD? Railroad purchase the stock and Company years, was WAS JOHN A. LOVELY to A as to confidence. bonds, insurance sharks -and patent the Northwestern had not yet, at corporations. the coming final contest. If for the purchase lease and franchises of It is property believed Co. in of that this the W. & St. P. R’y is we or record without The scores cases charge has been made by Democrats this time, gobbled Sioux City the road, Plainview railway 95. the up. chapter through apathy disaffection permit the company. parallel, which addition above not when is in to the it remembered or that Mr. If Wilson that Mr. copperhead. were undertakes Lovely But play confidence, to beware for oh legislature the Be it enacted by the of State of consequently find now 481 a a question of was your we on page verdict approval record of of of the Albert Lea is reported. In appealed and hence not • from business a An authorize great act to railroad Mil Mr. Taylor’s companies alter nesota: while living Watertown, away are to statements, Wis., in We why did he | at 1865. dear reader. have not the time House journal that Mr. Wilson introduced Democratic in ’BB, party that will their The & Peter Railroad party the location Section Winona St. routes of the lines 1. and railroad appeared since his nomination of their has centers. fact he or seek obtain his Fortunately to evidence in the is his hand so disposition follow Judge favor? proof at that this the to Wilson H. F. No. 642, bill to enable the Chicago nor own roads. hereby authorized Company to chase the a throw its pu at fragment of the is The recovered in these is for once away Col. If Gearey is is charge Below is money congress. questionai le untrue. fat simile cases all plains the vast of anti-monopoly. Be enacted by the and it the Legislature purchase lease & Northwestern stock Railway Company of the State to property a of a over or or which its shame, boldly garment of small when compared covers moment wth Plainview Minnesota; the Railrosd franchises of Company; witness, did why his political of handbill printed Watertown in at He has charged been with to maintain and a manager construct, upon never acquibe; operate annointed forth the apostle of The board named is hereby step Section directors said lasi authorized 1. of and of the principles railroad great that have been as company any this Mr. L. county, M. Gregg,write the occasion the JOHN A. LOVELY A REPUTABLE CITIZEN. of assassination IS champion to him of Abraham contended being of all the corporations. railroads in this state.” On 545 a and lease corporation by its and to sell of two-thirds to page vote of property convey and proceed policy or Reform, to out may, a for by Mr. Lovely in these casKy a explanation, for Lincoln. The and when he original in received handbill Did undertake champion is cases, he to them all whole number, the said first named the franchises an read: “On motion Mr. lime alter the to Hicks, at of the route, company, any upon we or submit In reply this charge the and to half revealed illy yet but yet and which have we been established firmly conceived as the be agreed by the of of their such that explanation, Mr. Lovely’s part route road, why did terms respective he possession, and extension not publish be he would do little But as may upon harm. any did or House any resolved itself into committee of can seen us we following statement: . branch thereof, directors of said panics, boards of of their by the decision road, of highest con. or part so as or courts any it, he certainly would by have who desires. done had it It our charge Judge Wilson with being the' as the attorney as the whole, Mr. Denny in chair. any one After expresses and extension branch the'pi franchises of said oinona to make constructed, if it openy hand, by united any If, the other, or or as the law—in several for the first we, on exonorated the honorable judge? sentiments which copperhead could cases the Chicago & Northwestern of shall St. Peter Railroad be used time them & Company to that ihe line spent therein the committee be no improved to appear some can effort, retain ground in this vantage time. our thereby; but and operated by it under its charter. All railroad this shall clearly have entertained, be diverted that in 1881 and Mr. Lovely wrote railroad. And using public no of trust in and reported so proves that they had had under THE TO PUBLIC. a rose district, and in 1888 glorious the wrest victory Provided, that such purchase of from county, town, village In the Madden of M. city & St. any any property L. a Judge Wilson or did regard and drew the case not the Gearey himself. On v. the the interest of Ais corporation against consideration H. (among others) F. No-642, up same as Plainview Railroad which, in its f of the capacity, corporate shall have ranch field, or ses hard fought the Democratic extended R’y Co., the principle decided a that on which, proviso, Mr. Taylor occasion referred in testifies, this is to handbill Mr. was the interests, all made not only other shall bill of aid said road, Company be and all such as relating either wlxile to the Northwestern to in the property hands corporations, a Freeborn having “weighed in The undersigned, citizens of been party the railway companies obliged provide Sft Railroad to Winona Peter of the then held by said & Company the Lovely offered delivered address present former the judge’s in are to the Methodist but the people in of geneftil, and owners or any Railway Company, same as which person was they reported an attention called and found wanting,” will float demands, claims and having had their balance subject all rights county, corporation, without the to of instruments, safe and of said that the nsent or c first House servant bill, File No. 101, “like church of Watertown, chip did Hon. citizens of Plainview and ‘Elgin—his buck the with a the as said Plainview Railway with dnst Company, amendments, village, and action county, town, city such recommendation distribut ag circular which is being d the time, where it or consent of to out current might not kn although ho used a upon in porridge, Hiram the doing Barber, Jr., neither harm since Republican ,w, be reasonable old friends of thirty years—in particular. arising growing the latter of thatthe bills shall expressed by of out do two-thirds a .te nor )of or company a v pass as amended.” thi District, Congressional containing wilkbe the idle of like toy diligence, that instruments such over every wave, a having obtained and disposed < the legal of said theretofore of good.” It did harm member Congress voters town, city village enough for him of from Chicago, and* county, cextain to How has he the charge? or The bill met It passed the 2d Marek, of certainly on A. Lovely, relating John dismantled fever ship abandoned bonds and have been statements to at election be purporting had for at to that to unsafe. coupons sea, an purpose, drop the Plainview railroad resident Mitchell, were that of D. T.: out of serious which 565 House Journal, he now a and be a was one; Plainview, Elgin and Violu page one issued by the of and such alteration shall be can made now in city town Mr. Lovely caprice and filled no desire they have known the of storm, to to any The Burgess of W. & St. P. R’y every say bill rather than have it tacked it. case It v. onto admits, if he be guilty, said Railway and found ought “politically Plainview Company, in 768 to village after the road shall taking of special laws been to follows: have or page on constructed as with the ghastly and noisome for number of that they entertain Co., forcibly illustrates different the attitude years; corpses this t-aid purchasing THE HONORED DEAD, a such under did therein, unless the transfer harm enough him shall have to have draft been act him.” damn same a general I the him exploded political shall all claims demands for highest respect of sanctioned and by of two-thirds of the respective vote (%) of the candidates assnixie company toward as a gases errors. a bill, No. 326, apparently covering the ABRAHAM LINCOLN. is He he not salaried attorney,” “a said Railway says said Pla nview the council against Company, of city of the to trustees of such village. and that sS lawyer citizen, far or and the railways the of country. The so a ground, but which in fact did not case simply that “he does their work and and value only of the and sends Before making franchises same such alteration extent property the any 205. CHAPTEB At informal meeting the of citizens Watert of statements reflect the said character an begun by Mr. Lovely, and his business upon board transferi ed. merely of directors shall designate autnorize the was the purchase thereof, of “stock,” route so bills,” in his that is, “he charges what he consider called to nation al berea wn, our ement, Lovely believe & Railroad integrity Mr. they Win- St. Peter authorize the Chicago and of shall tiled bee. The Company An & Northwestern be and recorded in 2. act to office since the of the associates his na nomination, to in the hope of putting through special committee five appointed of make to has mind to for it.” We don’t what a a was authorized a is hereby issue its capital Railway care Company acquire, Secretary’ of State. Thereupon it to to maintain shall construct, have the wholly them to be untrue. obse due damages the CERTAIN MATTERS OF REC- with solemnity, of railway arrangements to the later authorizing act the ve, recover purchase of company collecting make he has for his stock to and and railways rights privileges in the he and build to amount operate state of Mieneeota, such road, to necessary au complete manner pay, same as day for funeral obsequies set apart the of lamented Lea, June 25,1886. Albert our for severely injuring the plaintiff, former the purchase aforesaid. altered, if it original and franchises.” the line. “property a is their just as attorney, the We were Lincoln; have president, x Abraham and in ORD. same. accordance take effect and shall be in enacted by Legislature Sec. Sec. This force Be it the of State Tins shall take 3. act the ef 2. act effect and be in employe force of the company—and since with the will said meeting, of read his Rochester speech;—that This is the harm it did. And from let your and ’ ‘ and from after its Minnesota: from its now after passage. C. O. BARNESS, County Auditor. passage. Judge Wilson’s do business nd the clergy, nomination committee he to appeared recomm . The Chicago which the March it did Section I. & Northwestern Railway state republican convention Approved Approved 1881. if March 3, good. On the 7, 1881. 26th of us see no and citizens generally— V. GILRUP, Register of Deeds. men in behalf of—and is speaking the suit Winona In of of at present acting corporation created and Company, existing a drew platform, if law,” said Judge "Wilson, as its Take this December, remember—we “ 1885, the town of Plainview, religious That services suitable the occasion to as you This law has always been regarded by and ' F. W. BARLOW, County Treasurer. by virtue laws under of the of the States the attorney for railroad Minnesota Railroad Construction in the against the be held in various the churches of*this city company his Preston his House File No. 326 have read speech, have he shook the which is in action, and to first did obtain judgment on Illinois and Wisconsin, hereby we of is authorized lawyers in this end of the aiming county T. W. WILSON, Deputy County Treasurer. Wednesday,.the Thus as 19th inst., 12^4 o’clock the hand Company and the suit Lake City at have all of m. case St.’Peter ou one we empowered his Plainview of general laws) locate and heard speech. We shall public chapter 94 Winona and (now the & to against railroad construct or purchase, directly at the Plain view That the bells the railroad, of several churches be tolled Mr. Lovely’s relations so Judge Wilson toward against the and the and maintain in the State operate of same company, “submit give readers lawyers, these documents in full it to reputable in two the $74,451.00 of from o’clock 12 to 12'4 our any in company sum that the m. towns should defeat the JACOB LARSON, Sheriff. the Minnesota, subject Jaws thereof, case — railroad to railways the of during delivered country along in his speech recently at Preston, any That all places business be closed of. from 10 it affords professional just they furnished they don’t that better by his and if the of Plain view had to town issued $50,000 railroads as are say which be operated us railroad and relieved in be from can or C. MITCHELL, Sheriff. connection W. Deputy company, and 4 to affording the since printed and circulated and strongest a. m. p. m.; career literary bureau. than the Colonel with anyiailroad We protection the and hereafter owned to towns bonds the Elgin want to of town of $40,000— now or own you paying aid, railroad That the places business and the could, its of at private houses H. BLACKMER, Judge Probate. of that own guaranty district, such important throughout the said broadcast and operated by extension upon com any as an questions says: examine them carefully. bill (chapter 414 special laws, or We Gearey introduced indemnity the bonds, don’t want for principal draped and be mourning. as in option, “alter the route of their road,” WHYTOCK, County tehreof; and that end, the JOHN Attorney. branch said Chicago to reclaiming success^ the litigation quantity conducted the vast of “I to as In the midst of country’s joy for greatest a deceive body. We Mr. Wilson, himself,) I will to give by interest. Allow please, our to our want quote & Northwestern Railway any snail have and “without us now, co the consent of tjae town.” If company GEORGE T. GARDNER, Clerk District national called forfeited triumphs, and to the unearned lands within and I obtained and collected the ful conclusion, we are mourn and exercise and enjoy all the and if down and out.” the facte, them step briefly from the decision Judge rights, Collins, of may possess, you you can see as this is construction national calamities. Let to place greatest of unite Court. a proper us limits on of grants made to railroads city SIBO,OOO damages, and for for franchises, privileges immunities, and including powers, our over do, all right; if Again took Mr. Wilson at his word. not, again all right. If who passed the and with heart the observance in of the tokens of we we one the it certainly upon case, looks see plausible, GULBRANSON, President City domain, G. the of eminent conferred measure, other corporations, be disposed power to and accrued interest. And costs of for which respect patriots, the to find in all these documents There might be difference of opinion we, in provision in as that to if this chapter 414 owe memory like Minnesota you as by the laws the State of railway it look does if Mr. was not Wilson a oc upon Bank. as of th latest liberty, the benefit of whose glorious of actual was martyr settlers, having obtained and the of the s affording company, Provided, six “reputable lawyers” same the last Judge constitutes in companies. however, nothing Wilson what chip in the porridge. Judge Collins that years followed ever a quite achievements much in sadly by concerned protecting Ids R. M. TODD, Pres. Albert Lea Mill Co. so so are untimely protection the interests Lake City the contained shall the to of the bonds the city of herein authorize of to Chicago single fought battle, in legislature congressional campaign, but the lawyers the finds: death. C. A. Sprague, one rights making the the of towns he in Railway H. O. HAUKNESS. Postmaster. & Northwestern acquire to producers as was and shippers the company Northwest $75,000, brought suit against of amount of J. Lovely, A. in politics, it, against consulted of the Chicago Northwestern not and do out & comrol, by otherwise^ are the purchase parallel or certain we That in the Minnesota the interests 1881 state of the of railroad or or any McADAM, year W. 0. City Attorney. PETERSOn, by the A. of suitable laws Congress and I by that city to passage line railroad recover, was employed Railroad Company, into within wish be dragged political competing of the and in the interests to duly enactad certain entitled, not statute, “au state; act or a controversy, E Johnson, M. HALVORSEN, Editor Enterprise. w. company. the said for regulation and provided, that control defend and did and further, shall, of to authorize Winona the & St, Peter Railroad to company so successfully, stake of the people, give but will personal the Henry Bertram, we our we case. up the F. HALL, Mayor. exercising of eminent domain by Mr. Wilson purchase the stock had and much in his Company to purchase the to defense to carriers power the judgment. on of country he recovering The say Committee. common a his Plain view reputation In speech Judge Wilson that they reputable; at this conferred, and in all relating are proceedings any lease the and franchise of the act Plainview property City Clerk. D. W. DWYER, or in this town about would this House File be in sympathy with which they copld have and would received and in all suite proceedings sum confined himself mostly in words speak themselves, thereto, and his record for and Railway Company,” which said to rate, . act upon we was as RUNDIN, City Treasurer. A. G. B No. 326. It is LETTER FROM HON. HIRAM the BARBER, JR. labor if people will for the best interests in this in this suit would have of action arising in which it of the people, follows: St te same, our causes during ordinary intelligence legislature 1881. think the the session of of any man 3 City held and deemed be B. FOOTE, Justice. is be domestic JT. to remember, which party, he while vehemently shook the a other hand Judge had a Wilson’s almost $125,000 they recovered been Judge Collins here Mitchell, D. T., Sept. in full so quotes chapter 22, 1886—Hon. J. A. on him seize point. After carefully will his grounds. the We meet and otherwise. Provided, can examining corporation, that on not own Police. F. MERCHANT, Chief of Col. Feller, Lovely, Albert Lea, Minn.— at in the of the brief My Dear —1 employment Sir: present its several general all.” He then refers to suits attorney given above, and adds: am at 414, course this shall apply in as the Lws, general law nothing in act We before the journal the two chapter as te have of any manner us receipt of in letter the of 14th inst. I H. SQUIRE, Pres. City Council. your A. but confuted can discussion of the subject; it by the of Railroad gigantic railway recovered railroad the Plainview most in which he he from company. one says the general and 94, which is H. F. 326 above, and its House, special laws of that Which after duly accepted imagme what the act, insinuation not is based passage, was upon special KNATVOLD, This shall take effect and be force V Aiderman. Seo. in T. 2. act is the bill which he had examined by Mr. monopolies of the whose interests companies judgments in injured favor of consented country, and by the Winona & St. Peter railroad that sympathy with to the disloyal element were you in session. Mr Wilson, documen‘B law chapter 414, too had these and its one says: from after passage. F. W. Knapp and Dr. J. That the bonds known “Copperheads” here North P. Waste, and the will in at be directly and deeply G. DROMMERHAUSEN, Aiderman. closes affected employes, and this part of company. coupons as exmembers March Approved 7,1881. when he ' I that this general law. chapter 94, presented his cannot to see case our during this action in question the the As intimate bonds and acquaintance are same war. an the house, of by the needed legislation to that it is amply V. GULBRA.NDSON, Aiderman. his ground special sufficient speech and reference to tecord at the law chapter his prove honorable • covers same as legis- Let So that whatever he people. whether during the I bear not intend d by said statute, and that the testimony.on the our coupons can us see war or question, Read merely authorizes had all. it. It 411. been amended. Hers at it is in refute the to craftyinsinuation remarkable any that G. Q. SLOCUM, Aiderman. this his bar with statement: not recited in tnis action That the true and I beg the matters soldiers to veteran of in mind when introduced are lator have he on assure presented the fairly. matter may railroad purchase to of the stock company another, that full: the day of May, said Winona & district 11th 1881, the charge is and without St. unjust election is opposed by truthfully them, and H. G. DAY, Editor Standard. I and your emphasizes believe that assert “I whether it the can companies this first session allows consolidate What his in that ? act to two was or measure, was Peter Railroad acting Solely foundation under th" in fact. personal Your warmest company the danger which threatens I have collected Since makes the interests C. L. LUCE, Member Rep. Con. Oom. record that the constitution by the state their stock, Sioux City, Plainview, the other will find it journal. friends during prove 60 of the provisions of said statute purchased all the period You the those who or some page property war on were stockholders always liable, tran.-fer of the people should a mere or the ranks W. E. TODD, Member Rep. Co. Com. railroad companies of much from franchises of said Plainview gloried in Union victories—not and Railway those who is another of his railroad, here bills more Wednesday, 19th,1881, very It January capie consolidation of would endanger the on was STATE OF MINNESOTA. not stock and referred to in said tatute, took with exultant when Company faces of rebel triumph* the paid attorneys of the W. corporations, W. WILLIAMS, Ex-Editor Standard. other in a the State than attorney rumors of amended in committee of the whole, in any introduced House file rights of claimants. Hence, that bill (chap. No. 101, 326 He in deed thereof transfer and from Plainview said hand, and who regarded at Lee the were as already in Congress, be swelled by the State.” laws 1881) the proviso favor of the “And the record shows, too, 94, in creditors Plainview railroad is gen. which the distinctively Railroad Company. general the world greatest No; ever saw. you is It would be just election bill enable Winona Railroad mere surplusage. the Peter of the “A to & St. as trained present C. Also the following resolution attorney of the adopted important with in all matters acts quite another crowd, that and It is mentioned. difficult, five my If Mr. Wilson’s general after act you are entitled good without it. Again; if bill covered the was that so very and purchase the franchises to property the credit honorable loyal company to of and & N. W. Co. R’y unanimously by rising without an vote the Freeborn unselfish and fee of have been Twenty-second ) elapsed have to state from a ground, did or why Judge Wilson introduce good the of Plain view and Elgin for town Minnesota Valley years of the Railway same memory record. Very company; respectfully, Session. In the H. F. Herrick ) of M. & St. L. Republican all? Now look bill Convention, such reward I the others the Plainview county except got rervard, at at precise case hatfield Railroad Pls in the day and the the precise v. the it good terms as as a why not enough for his ef Hiram view company; Barber, Jr. was company? (special chapter4l4). only horizes laws 1881, it not R’y Co., Chicago Dakota Railway the plaintiff the and au Railway injured in lowa, Sept. 27th, motion Gov. community, of Armstrong. of the and by feeling member company; amendment proposed was for which CoL on You it the and property a the purchase of Plainview see was of the Introduced by Mr. and the Dakota Central Railway Wilsoa, Feb. the stock 'Bl. 8, company, where the provides, statute the Minnesota Resolved, That this convention duty heartily I had done fearlessly.” that Gearey and Col. Feller faithfully as Railroad but franchise insisted, my it authorizes of the Plainview that LETTER FROM and Company, E. D. PORTER. the said roads; the purchase lines to operate of company company; law does not, that corporations the reading of careful his speech,, the pursued by the From of of property without amend Sth (6), and franchises but have approved March wanted Now not shown enough are approves course and act and its stock. a to they not to A an or e BILL. we was convince The following letter from Mr. E. D. That would work quite liable hund the stock thousand ed and (1871), purchasing for the injuries eight to through delegates this main seventy-one servant from county the late will be that the of Republican it to a Judge Wilson exceedingly magnanimous reasonable mind that purpose the seen not any another result, for it would leave the towns to Porter, for sheriff two terms & of Freeborn entitled, “act enable Winona St For act authorize the to Railroad Companies to an an any the negligence fellow of Congressional This Convention demonstrate servant. Judge to the at the to famous a with Judge Wilson the Plainview Railroaii which in introducing ral law, just contest in was people that Railroad purchase the Lease, Purchase in pursue company, Peter to to Become gem ex-soldier property county, with company honorable or any way an an could suit brought in Minnesota, and in remaining district, would have anybody reach. the Kasson, steadfast and especially the that this to property to of Railway was Winona, Mankato Ulm of & New of, Control no Plainview committee of the whole, Owner to other Railroad protect the of and understood in the towns our to or any as and record, who hrs known Mr. Lovely principle company.” Corporation Consolidate contended for Mr. Lovely by candidate for is to Therewith. And did only consult Hon. John A. Fillmore he not not of county, that “reputable farmers or duplicity this five congress, Elgin and similar Can town for we one cases? not matter years, was a for nearly is twenty the to point: Be it enacted by the Legislature of the of State years, that the lowa understand that could Lovely, and the is to lawyer” and all statute be eby securing It but several, they his nomination; has been, sharp, and was now necessary clearly of imagination, Mr. Wilson proven? enforced as some say, a be would never Minnesota: more pure as and in another Elgin The 1878 the of Plainview, state. and earnestly towns agreed that this fair of court condemn and characterize railroad lawyer, but real, in statement shrewd Any railroad chip have Section corporation, If this “like in the people believe. With thia we 1 either was a act Grafton, so genuine vast Dak., a Sept. —I 12, 1886. heard was a porridge, our never 1877, domestic hold, and for the first voted petition, of foreign, time in its by under act whether organized under legal points And think history. false and slanderous Viola, the of the before the public benefactor,one whose whole attacks live that Lovely copperhead—before or a as case. we doing neither harm good,” of evidence before kind then reader, was a or nor array you, general law by virtue special charter, during of the and he has or been dollars bonds a In the of Greene hundred thousand to may not M. Ac St. L. made his private, of it is clear enough that anybody R’y in service the war, am sure official and life spent the of has been case v. Mr. Wilson, himself the doubt that Mr. Wilson upon so can attorney has one of the purchase, can lease, in you now become since. I consider it the duty of G. or or A. R., any way owner every Co., principle decided construction Plain view rail- the the understand it. that where political character. the of fighting corporations with- aid “dear people” control hold of, the stock Winona & St. Peter played false, both in the legislature was of other rail- have must and loyal or voter fall line and or to into touch any company, you man