SUPPLEMENT. LAKE CITY GRAPHIC. CITY. ' LAKE MINN., OCTOBER • 26, 1886. shoulders right left did employe from (as from ’6l has knowledge defective to fee to of ABILITY? out reward, and ADDRESS. evidence we an of the or A. LOVELY A MAN OF road. Those IS JOHN as of the citizens road Plainview corporation when their of respective railroads the Under these circumstances, ’65), and elect Kasson nominee. The is it used judgment in party to be advising his machinery and notifies his employers fact he cites the very poor of above referred lawfully to. connected and cases namely, operated G. W. be Harrington together can lines tightly drawn and and the nearly others, too votes wondered are Col. at that “ Gearey this question submit and purchase the reply the the to In to property and the fact, that if they Let continuous company him of its we for to stop constitute line, with so moment as one balanced to inquire First main in the District admit of assure into who to us a opposed any to giving this bonus, were of without rest paid lobbyists,” brancnes. franchise records Freeborn terribly of the Plainview To the following the of Voters of the First from Congressional or our fooling in national affair this kind. safety and promise of it, were to repair he the facts disclosed company by the a public records can recover secured temporary injunction Bec. railroad against Any 2. corporation, whether a distrustful of Judge E. Porter. Wilson, D. and “solely that it under the provisions of District: showing of said county, for term the statute.” for subsequent injuries, provided a years of Winona and to what organized extent his general by virtue see the town under law officers, - of a preventing or them from annoyed him much? if district And the proviso in this calendar in the the court act very such instrument is special charter of the immediately hatred Territory qf not for BU»te was cases corporations on Minnesota, his or “love for issuing so the or bonds. Mr. Harrington, LETTER FROM AN EX-PROVOST MARSHAL. Judge Wilson also no laws of stated less under the publicly than and in other in worthless Judge Collins that county the number which State of or must any dangerous that or of ordinary the dear people” induced him fight a man to the doubt, prudence presuming little States Territory, lines that long of railroad . whose Plainview a or that Col. upon Gearey’s Mr. A. H. Nichols, Deputy now be who counsel: amendment to base his decision in judgment Mr. Lovely has appeared was would longer an refuse it. Minnesota Railroad ass to as a Construction Company constructed hereafter use acquaintance within without this and or friendly or relations with proviso his to bill Provost Marshall Watertown, 364, at Wis., chapter involving upwards of or 414 hundred State In the Tierney lawfully connected now of M. & St. L. in the now interests be and operated one can of that city, case and v. Hon. Thomas Wilson, which the Judge Ap’rd Counsel. No. Cases. of special laws, together ‘‘like during the volunteers the following as to continuous chip in the and fifty thousahd dollars constitute line, the one was R’y Co., main war, several principles a decided, whether in this “important on matter” the were speaks about, at sought to with without retain admit November branches of term 1872.. 39 20 or to the porridge; once so a» it did neither testimony: harm provisions this good.” of statute. but the important, nor very most because it record shows same establishes that his acts have been unselfish of trains them without June him Town, break 1873 58 27 counsel term for passage over the but for or as If it did harm, why did reasons he Said Mr. Wilson Col. Gearey it? to no first time for consolidate the principle, is December and without interruption, oppose their stock and on one term 1873.. 61 36 fee reward. may ; a new or doubt better known to Mr. Minneapolis. Minn., Sept. Wilson 27, 1886.— H0n.. no But he he did franchises, not. He such occasion—we have his Junetermlß74 terms be agreed referred words it— 53 to for 37 upon says as may “that negligence the of the There is file own part (car) in the office on of the city will A. Albert Lea, Minn— You on Tiarrington John Lovely, than either Mr. to become by December.term 50 to Mr. 1874.. 40 as one Robert upon, so Taylor, corporation attorney- “Do or ourself, any at law, think for moment that I would of inspectors failing please for taking the liberty writing in properly discharge you of to recorder Winona a of contract excuse me between by them selected. June 60 a did 1875 44 term not succeed. name But when the he Kasson, to that did but 1 by the that has case try to for the to not set trap towns of Plain- prove you, see papers some one this of duty, inspect immediately the Articles terms consolidation (to December Judge and stating oppose a • 1875.. 44 the city, the term 35 dated February cars trial, accused to 10, and behold, Judge of being copperhead during came Wilson, the it; that he and Mr. Taylor you a shall view be by and Elgin?” Yes, approved each June 69 by agreed yes! In term 1876 corporation vote 54 a were their arrival, and if repair 12,1875, we of whereby say, oflt to in on consideration upon of the while in Watertown, Wis. I there the attorney war, suppose of the Winona & of stockholders St. December Uie of the term 1876.. 57 majority the 41 owning amendment. a We took the the face of all this evidence train the only next mark had better chance of spotting them ‘in bad order,’ indicating that by to. conclusion payment, the city, him was no of man a copperheads fee in of June Peter stock, regular Railroad by at term 1877 63 42 either person or proxy, a a engaged to company, morning and interviewed was Mr. myself, I marshall Taylor. reasonable mind than for provost | In reach is was they annual be sent to the‘repair SIO,OOO thereof, special a to track,’) December 1876.. and meeting 45 all meeting at can term “necessary or 31 disbursements,” a were assist C. T. Benedict, attorney the time and could finger all for the put of at fact accompanied my Mr. Wilson on called for that Judge by of Thomas Wilson, June that there least the paid term 1877 47 notice at we attorney purpose, 30 by which of the plaintiff injured the Jude on agreed to reason prosecute the but I could finger them, I was Plainview put not Railroad my on you, as The days, stating injunction thirty object December such meeting, tne of his term 1878.. 57 43 Mantorville, company. to where to he of the Winona St. & made Peter Railroad way while attempting always considered loyal hope to couple 1 damaged referred by a to him to final judgment. be you a man. you a cases addressed stockholders April of such 1879 to term 59 a dissolved 48 eacn and bonds when the issued was political, non-political win and fill the office with honor speech, then employed to yourself litigate the to or may without notice of is company, its condition, their and as of September These suits place residence deposited term 1879. 78 either then known, 60 car, pending -were passed to the Chicago & Northwestern constituents. over be, that in office, evening. ana your It certain the post and published would bonds declared January case have by the for at least term 1880.... 83 may 59 three and without fault his might part, be about supreme to be commenced. Thereafter, whereabouts on glad learn of and I or to railroad vour and am by them weeks April been 1880 41 company successive 31 in one newspaper matter for Mr. term in Wilson court of the State of Minnesota have an easy to to imputed It speaks well the company.” nomination. of to standing the writer is informed by your your of of of 1 least cities towns in September . as sold the 1880 60 to Wisconsin term at one each 44 parties. one Mr. Which Harrington have been at this interview. present been unconstitutionally live. respectfully, obtained where Yours Indeed from the W^'i you the of Freeman M. & St. of said Ln L. has its principal January prominent business 1881.... most and term 87 corporations 57 respected citizens, case v. our carried the rfWB the to A. H. Nichols. court case he into Mr. supreme oilice, Taylor’s towns of Plainview Elgin, May and by office and term 1881 consent even came to be 68 the majority 49 or in ot R’y Co., writing important principle a 1 who then member of the a very was was a and there obtained council, decision declaring of articles; ' stockholders annexed January ;. such such while term 1882.... 76 to 58 a there, but null a stepped right and void, did prostitute his we were out sacred decided in the plaintiff, favor of and for bills ATTORNEY? for “necessary disbursements” articles IS JOHN LOVELY A RAILROAD of May the law such of consolidation of the A. term 1882 under 63 which the and 46 copy bonds voted again. We not hunting were trust public legislator and material did seek were the first time in this is as a It record of up state. that where of January presented t*rm 1883.... to the council 50 such such for approval or consent, 39 payment. accompanied were unconstitutional, and the bonds null with The Democratic circulating . which to destroy him, all to set traps these May of for towns, that by lists tue stockholders said wanted his railroad papers are of term 1883 49 40 resident leases its objection' we corporate track There to considerable a >n the to a was and void. Mr. Lovely January number of held the equally false charge that 1884.... 62 corporation, tne by the term shares facts. We 36 ana would ‘ have might been avoid glad paying was its just company corporation another it is of state not of these payment bills the ground that certified May duly by 1884 The fall term 43 on following each, tneir presidents Judge respective 28 Wilson railroad The fact is, he has have is to had him attorney. there. obligations. As Col. Gearey was it, a puts “He thereby released liability, from unless I the May item with the therein term 1885 44 and seals mentioned respective 32 secretaries corporate for one elected to the house was of representatives. counsel railroad We appeared for made known the object went lo the ' ' of legislature November 1885.. thereto of said visit to as a be by never term attixed shall tiled legis- 55 the the 41 corporations, consent of state to lease has been traveling our secure that that at time it expenses, Harrington and his attorneys apprehended for the olhce in where practiced law I to Mr. Taylor this he has record ot Becretary Btate, of state, ot and he said: in lation what he could not get in the obtained. i well-known that fact the Judge the was and ' Total a this that Territory, probable state, ot tne (States 1621 Btate 1218 was would be or or to On the nearly for twenty move courts.” enable 1 received years. contrary, letter from Judge Emmons ^C. In the & St. by ■ Wilson of L. a the happy said laws the of under whose corporations case or some v. the possessor the Winona a & pass St. Peter over to purchase I weeks the show, he has this subject, dockets but Mr. Wilson introduced such 1 1 ago on another document Being trifle parties articles of consolidation as prosecuted in to cannot of 75 of R’y Co., decision cent agree of importance great lines were ere- to a excess of road which per this alleged a with his on the version the property of and franchises and of I expense the Plainview ashamed Htedo exist, following against railroad before consolidation shall case, th© am in his Plainview any such speech hie whole to cases the number. John A. Lovely, farmers obtained, . the Republican and for the first prove candidate 1 incurred to have and that not was yet answered liim. therefore it It say have is always was Railroad Upon Company, vanaity eitect. bling for and any the requested or companies: generosity toward these two towns. But Mr. Loyely is unpleasant President of the State to make Congress time. Heretofore railroad statements in for in political this District, companies did constitute of said not legitimate record, shall said a the charge contest. copies, corporations was Col. E. C. Gearey, a representative in following appealed 1 The to have our uesirc he do injustice read to only portion ' become . it, no Judge of the last cases were Bar Association and merged to has been since its the provided born at Burlington, have in instances wilfully in new corporation a Vt., in November, neglected against the city, portion. but organization, less than many majority Wilson, the legislature, and to keep bis at the time 1 a for free for Federal Courts, and same to and the Supreme be thereafter by am eye in articles, to We open saia known say the document present in which full shows the in 1843, and is esteem to build adjacent their consequently in his fences lines 43d to of of the council that I particular concurred in friend this of Mr. construction Lovely, am no but year. the therein such shall, Knowing corporate adopted, and that in name single They’ any with exception. measure. that . everybody have ample time a which he is held recollections and were won by his His profession. Heis the father road. Their policy of matter briefly may for has been avoid my of the to follows. leading the Judge’s of witlun this the was Btate, succeed to are contract with the years city ail rights, as one powers, Judge Wilson they had boy deal to The bill will found ir^ the Reports mentioned: first be introduced no opportunity by study it J Wilson to himself. franchises, as for also privileges, It member of the Local Counsel udge contracts, merchants this burden, of and they business consider it, and if immunities, of that a and the term “necessary disbursements” as men with, the the town boards the of these chapter two tqwns was sxme present as 372 liabilities from consists to, (on stipulations exemption taxation, of or agreed * United communwatio.m, between the States to he Bar Association. city, which stock'was killed compromise, represented in to fight the Vermont applied 922) the to his of special and laws the bills of or page 1881, Co., Minnesota as that Herrick M. & St. L. R’y Plainview and except 32 pass, of and Elgin mixed, also were engaged Col. property, real, personal v. Thomas Wilson, attorney Mr. Lovely then for the Winona it included five times nominated also the Plainview Legislature. , such He the also of stock. The railroad. allowed in I Reports, was and and 435. paid. The suits'were things fully owner ail action, respects the was a consequence as in pronounced page W. H. as Feller, ex-member the prosecuted of house, drew the an amendment & which St. Peter Railroad ottered up the Co. N. for County and 0. Sherman M. & St. P. R’y W. Attorney K. C. 25 of Freeborn old was to Abolitionist, county, same possessed by has been that the were such Corporation company, improved agent of the v. of final judgment, or to and the an owners amount bill by Col. a St. Geary to to Paul and and Col. assist Mr. W. H. Feller. Gearey. Col. Rep. go corpoiations of such 593. Davis at the consolidation time and Kellogg & Eaton, attorneys and elected for each time by following Underground the Railway, lands through and which railroads personally was Geary stated collected and myself from the worked When actively run But St. L. Co., N. W. Rep. the M. & R’y 28 Emmons the 19th under the laws company. of January, then existing; and among stated’ such v. on new corporations the as towns Plain of view and Elgin, respective of and members the legislature votes: conducted Madden in favorof fleeing had slaves have to watch their stock the the to their to borders L. M. thereafter amendment. M. & St. R’y Rep., shall Co., 32 the Judge all evidently thinking hold many and tne and enjoy v. p. same, above, Judge Wilson introduced H. F. JUDGE 1 WILSON ’orms OPPOS. of the D part in THE which Judge thereof, the 303. and a of inconvenience part without case promised land—Canada. great and damage. Mr. every impairment He that the SIO,OOO or “fee” sufficient not AMENDMENT ( 101, Col. Gearey was earnestly a at telegraphed for he could, as & L. R’y M. Rep., but Greene M. St. Co., 31 Lovely. Opposition. fully once change as Dollins the 'has and rendered to tne judgment p. as in same manner v. in favor leading Congregationalist Lovely contended for and secured decision and seemed if “reward” his anxious for services possible was a in this “important avoid a contributed to light their 1868 legal counsel, if said 248. 1061 Mr. the 145 Taylor, extent had an open consolidation and he, same as not )f the town of Plainview. It is it in house. * folows: 1 ngth largely the At he his that where railroad on of brought and labor M. M. Rep., & St. L. R’y Co., to as Herrick 31 1870 matter,” Provided, 852 taken That 727 presented to the ail council place. and means p. compan es rights creditors, us a v. at -. too, St. Paul. to went proposed substitute 1 for amendment which liens our he 1876 and all 11. 1627 the of to build their 1110 of that denomination failed to fence roads the properly either in Burlington, of upon their meeting the up 29th March, of 1882, owner had drawn The and point made wanted on by Judge Wilson to and M. & St. L. R’y Co., M. Rep., us accept Tierney said old 31 1878 corporations shall to 1491 preserved 787 be unimpaired, agree was v. p. where it land has long adjacent been damages tire leading for bill instead for 16,289.75. It in may The the the lobby “a.” recover of $289.75 oi onrs. of the was house 1880 a that exhibit 234. bills 2064 sum he presented liabilities 1005 and all the dents, and duties of not were which crowded i religious decreased and could society. When the rental value was the subject of such laud well Madden M.&St. L. R’y Co., M. Rep., not study 30 he we then stated, of said consolidating corporations shall for “necessary disbursements,” either v. p. as amended, and district Court, was consequently all the YVabasha talk State consult about J county, of Minna-80 it there, 1 hastily ano glanced In 1868 453. there thenceforth this opposing candidate, of sketch attach said corporation but fourteen caused by the neglect over to to of fence, new and was no leaving $16,000 was ta. years for his even fee it and said in . amendment of substance: “It secured by looks member first Tierney M. & St. L. R’y Co., M. Rep., read- 33 be enforcable and on our tne extent, the v. p. to same and in same but scattering Phe Town death of Elgin deprived vote The him his though stock has been killed cast Winona of father, & injured. if this St. Petar a $6,000 would ve. age was than he originally protect the no interests agreed mg as or the 311. or more all bosh. of Let if liabilities debts, such and duties manner, as was us see. Railroad Company. but ' against him. had better With leaving the exception take it his untried The this of that towns, hands the effect of decision C. M. & St. P. will be we Nelson R’y Co., M. Rep., had to and 30 to originally incurieu by upon prosecute the our for, and the been it. room support bill r. On the 27th Che Town January, cases of of Plainview 110 as of The Winona carefully study & it and St. page have ve. consultation before he received a his highest shall consolidate Widowed majoritv 3. JNo of mother and invalid compel the companies the Bec. obey railroad to to the law. corporation year Peter presented Railroad a Sibi'lrud allowed and paid, an Company. that, deciding.” the journal, find Judge Wilson was that: said so he M. & L. R’y Co., M. St. Rep., ted 29 we with, lease no, purchase, in served wan a v. p. or or become last time he any way It hereby having is sister. How well Mr. Lovely after stipulated and In the Sherman two admitted has discharged of O. M. & St. in decision then i each and ran, in at least and there. this important Col. case v. matter he Geary him 58. cut of, other one railroad control owner or any cor-, x>th the of above entitled actions, short that the with Chisago successive “Mr. Hicks, this filial terms. from the committee prompt refusal duty Co., do it does P. R’y it decided judiciary, to a not become Thoreson M. Harvester Works, M. Rep., for the first Judge received prop-' and 29 poration,or fee $16,000, on franchises, rights of stock, so, was than v. any a or A Northwestern or more Railway Company Wilson said ! all sold whom thu nf to referred H. F. bill *We 101, enable some forcible was Mr. to gs than 341. Lovely has performed more discuss. a thereof, to • acts of erty controls parallel will only time “that whether p. it wnicn not the owns nine-tenths or a or bonds us many of the and in question or farmers workingmen of the was tie say custom plaintiff Winona polite, . the &St and off, taking Peter Railroad his went towns Company Clark C. M. & St P. R’y M. Rep., proposed substi- Co., 28 to competing line. v. p. service the public. Among ibove named, that he has provided to T. them there Thomas, them with mode of doing to business of of the defendant with him, Baraboo, in of purchase 1 did the the district the property and tute and franchises a comfortable or will their of certain not afterward. it 69. shall I take effect and see 4. This act be in earn Bec. on State of Wisconsin, for the price railroad of is drawing cannot remember eighty the bill which other and of companies, reported anything that home, passed separate adjoining leave the back, his R to frogs unprotected, in it, M. & St. L. M. Rep., that and I per Freeman Co., 28 up a farms in force from and its their shops same was in lifetime. after v. y p. so passage. or of their a •ent face value, he being don think ' t either par or the recommending Col. that the do pass.” Geary Col. man Feller 443. the Legislature same in 1881, unpretentious residence, repealing or in its the law which employes might be they presumed know to The Mr. Wilson, lamed Thomas attention too, remember, deemed referred of the public is called in to read to the deposition hoard it all, of you at though 1 or M. L. R’y Co., be Isaacson & M. Rep., St. 27 mistaken may v. p. giving .’harles F. lllsley . , live in the Municipal Court The and of St. bill in the. contentment. that such Paul and read After the the suits. custom mode doing in that. of the above Judge exceedingly Wilson e peace facts, came up himself fortunate was not object was have then to much second to a or to struck 463. the so Second. It is also further admitted Plainview , and railway stipuated jurisdiction short time all State time January school the civil matter of spent at Mr. Lovely businc. and, of 28th.—House journal, his continuing out bil became Crandall Mclllrath, receiver .by in S. M. the and of the over “fee” in this been able to find original bill. but as s. to the As we v. present tne in each case, both of the and above of ceased I entitled opposition, course, and M. Rep., our 1 ac,ions R’y Co., 24 127. involving teacher 128. Now, and not than S2OO. Under then, taught with employment, let p. have t-ken came themselves turn to cases to facts disclosed conclusive evidence that the a more page that by been terms and a success the records of Winona us provisions page has not on it of home Afterward Judge "ilson statute introduced Sweet C. M. A P. R’y Fed. Reporter. unler St. Co., 11 the February v. the latter which said bonds which has marked his law 104, Friday, if could be through the risk incident 4. issued, life. t© that doing it, kind in of of bill all to amended were a referred respecting career person Qiat they he the House J the do he is same Plainview were way trying a not, to reipects prove 355. railroad ournal. as p. conformed and to complied alone, and with 1 by the Soon found in Ramsey afterwards he studied county and service obtained law, in this for, admitted the evidence was again sent stood, and to make He cited introduction “. he general orders its went the having to was was ease, people believe, show been reached as “that the Hlainview Railroad on page Company, and Paul, ■ that the St. conferred with ana Col. Gearey, and The following with date 1 of the bar, him, he house resolved itself to could be sued in that opened question jury into committee office for the decide. of the whole, at cases to commencement his ’Proposition” upon 171, the acts in of the committee submitted an a these important report matters judiciary, under have think, ; with Col. said I eller also; statute on and Col. was Gearey told Mr. Gould in the chair. After sometime suit have been instituted spent all Watertown, of and Wis., in 1865, there provision respects complied and in In the court 1867, Crandall for with, of Mcllrath, n and that the been he had his amendment ■ said recommending was no a unselfish that the bill case and without ready, fee do me and removed v. reward” an had full therein 1 he or committee pass and reported so that they Plainview rose Railroad Company had understanding ■ which Mr. by the firm of Lovely is prior the ismance Albert Lea, change with to to important of The result where ho principle that members has an decided it, for that a the and that in had 253 he venue. was luul under its second reading thus seeking deceive consideration on those resided was to (among page ; of said bonds on on page earned and many become of without entitled was sure need of personally success further member by him and innumerable workand since, since the first vexatious suits others) F. acknowledged time, brought H. relating head which 101, Winona is that “where to & Peter St. or servant ignorant the ever 261: if were report of the of the shows law authorizing facts he a conclusively committee of the whole, 1 o same, their issue returned home, and did so hear was the final not Railroad which Company, they reported back during 1877, viz: lonetitutioual. of the bar in the Tenth against But it Judicial farmers and others in various is District, seeks charge also to his admitted negligence that master for discussions, ' there placing 1 that it remember general orders, portions after all it. The he is not much 35U; of as bill last on WITH AMENDMENTS, page so and a recommended that re- election of the vote electors >vas no ferred • of said and with amended by or few superiors of to, in in the state, in fictitious motion the employing state unfit as fellow of Col. Gearey servant, public thiru benefactor read many cases upon they the and would like do AS AMENDED. time passed without as a an he the either pass of them as authorizing hapter ' owns or the Clausen M. & St. L. R’y Co., Aug. 1881’ issue 1 414 (on 7, 1877. 9u3)oi special v. is i page laws of successful lawyer and advocate. and trumped-up claims. defendants, through whose The unfitness the injured, farmer is jf said bonds, voters amendment 509. of the district But believe. had by to he vote the electors Parker M. & St. L. R’y Co., and 1 believe the or 2 Aug. page proviso any 11, 1877. The Plainview Railway appearing v. Company in it had is the Mr. Proposition Lovely the has having Paul, “ sought political the been ” Co., Aug caught in St. role uixm therefor, but that of is Romanson M. & St. L. R’y proof that that 1 drew ' the little never 3 14, farther, and turned same amendment proper to as v. an the to first a gone been stricken page out and the bill passed proceedings had by and in as bill, 1 have were of preferment 1877. stated, in changed pursuance except the Ijne his when the served and of unfitness them is as in its a shown have omy to would verbiage there processes were he have upon bbO, found that profession, existed “Un petition of majority is Chap. of the 372 of the special a tax of Bickford M, L. , laws, follows:. said 4 &St R’y Co be applicable Aug. 20, 1877. to the to payers so as branch v. as road instead in the one they compelled the and present and it at time at great of employment, save prima Mr. provided motion Wilson, were of town in said case, the House expense as statutes. Chamberlain M.A St. a all the ’ L. R’y of branches. 5 Co., 21, Aug. concurred v. TABLES TURNED. Third. with It is reluctance further great loss of time stipulated that he yielded facie to St. Paul their and to with of negligence admitted, is made was 1877. out in the Senate case go amendment H. F. No. to Does it look if Judge * Wilson 372. that had shall CHAPTER as be raised no the value issue to of the 6 Christopherson M. St. the solicitation^ & L. R’y Co., to Aug. as of his witnesses and friends and against the counsel and the contest v. master, and the burden is bill 326, authorize An Act enable to railroad consented to the Winona & St. upon Peter Railroad been particularly and franchises a property partial the any company of Plainview to the Railroad towns 27, 1877. of be to candidate him before for Congress. disprove strange jurymen, else Company to to purchase, negligence,” instead etc. Company transferred • a of lease, causes to purchase, to the or in defendant, but that Greene B. C. R. &N , Dec. Plainview 7 and Elgin? 20,1879. or Or any way does v. it look Be enacted by it the Legislature judg-® this point of the State if the plaintiffs At of as do submit and either better Arnstad requiring regard the plaintiff the claims without of them than to or S. M., Dec. to the negligence we can 8 26,1879. pay recover no become of control other v. if prove to he had owner bent or any Minnesota: THOMAS WILSON, legislator against every the defendant nerve ment as question shall a be Isaacson M. & St. L. Co., from his 9 R’y Dec. 1879. quote speech 6, their justice. no before the to Mr. the Freeborn of Lovely’s attention v. master, and in employing railroads, Section That to consolidate therewith. 1. section (1) made an of chapter to the sixtynine railroad by defendant, or but that one for the R’y which, property Murtaugh B. C. R. & serve a 10 N. Co., Feb. for 23, company v. County Republican having called Convention, unfit fellow been to this affairs (69) state of entitled sonyeyed servant. of act “an enable and t to the question deeded The being the defenoant on by taken the to the a< the time being, 1880. least, at upon he passage the paid Winona A St. Peter Railroad was. Company Plainview Railroad July 1,1886, in Company by the that to Mr. Lovely fact to and is in resolution has several in Freeborn value farmers Hewitt B. C. R. & N., pending purchase and response 11 M. & St. L. R’y ten was the bill, a of there v now some attorney, whether THE as TOWNS amended, the were PLAINVIEW, ELGIN and yearly OF AND property franchisee the of salary jqnal Winona, upon judgment obtained. the It a to is being Co’s., March so instructing the delegates 4, 1880. or had there chosen against county been sued railways under this to companies, involving 54, and cases unjust none.” Does this Mankato & New Ulm look Railway sonceded for ompany,” not? the of this yeas nays action, < that the Severson A R’y approved purpose 12 M. L. Co., Sept. St. 30,1880. v. the Kasson Convention law, he drew “to all $2,000 bill providing March honorable from sixth (6th), to $15,000. for thousand talue the of eight hundred and is use up if the bill a a VIOLA. had been property equal one the not was to R’y amended? And this Sibilrud M.A L. Nov. is 13 St. Co., 13, 1880. not all as the evidence v this and (1871), seventy-one be and claimed the complaint. the on imounts nominate him is to change in the Republican is of all the It to such in to remark that in the same E. Clark M. means 14 A. C. & St. P. &S. M., Dec. venue as 1, could proper cases Then what have been Mr. Wilson’s v. cases point. Col. Feller, hereby having amended had read follows: to somewhat 1 Wilson, so as as homas 1880 candidate Congress counties where for in and Burgess Woodin the defendants resided. this of W. & St. P. R’y motive in bringing ection 1. The Winona ex-members of the v & of discussion Attorney i St. Peter Railroad with for Mr. defendant, up Wilson, Wm, Clark & St. a 15 C. M. P. &S. M., Dec. the 1, v. over district.” became This bill Wilson, Judge law Company Co., the the at is hereby Democratic authorized C. > EIGHT LITIGATION. legislature K. Davis YEARS to and a session OF to that according to the points, 1880. candidate in his prove, public meeting same in this purchase lease the and Kellogg Congress of the Legislature or property & 1881, Eaton, for M. in this of Sweet C. district, 16 & St. P. &S. M., Dec. journal, 1,1880. he showed it it to them, had v. town the 4th, appears as Col. franchises to of the wrote E. Winona, C. Mankato on Gearey, “I A New Ulm honestly, the candid Plaintiff’s to expression Freeman < attorneys. say you M. as 17 & St. L. R’y Feb. and be 18, 1881. railway found for the v. 0., and in this may Railway Company, been amended. company, upon pages not the Minnesota receiver Valley of Railway of the Fargo heart, that would I prefer, if I land office, now my B. now 18 Greene C. R. &N. R’y March from were Co., 16,1881. Mr. v. Wilson 173-4 of the give general laws only read connection Company, the Rochester for that the list A Northern last DURING alone choose of the Minnesota And what to future, here in the WHICH HAS FOUGHT the to continue we a year. MB. WILSON of this nature amendment? whom he paragraph received my 19 Carter als., M. & L. li’y April cases St. Co., the et 9, was following v. reply: Company, Railway the Chatfield Railway labors Company, of of profession, which associations It be this defended must not forgotten Mr. document, which he has that for and my that then and my 1881. The News is not running, for company the Chicago < A Dakota congress, Railway with have Fabgo. made dear THE rather than OUT OF D. to to TOWNS IN AND THE T., Oct. 20 School 6,1886. liere you ompany, so me, Diet. 76 M. & St. L. R’y Co., April Lovely is 9, the its regularly candidate represented since he became nominated that his attorney v. in 1875: desire great to and the Dakota therefore it ( entral Railway is not afraid Company, of all Hon. „ nr W. H. tt « leller,1 the and enter political of Elgin, uncertain of life Minn. eller, upon any career 1881. a leal liepublican with the the of either State Minnesota which has of them, and greatest of W. party of said last Dear fairness which & St. P. R’y named toward Sir: Yours to and invitee or companies of partial judgment LEGISLATURE. the facts. We took sth v. STATE the inst band Nelson trouble visit this 21 to to your generous C. M. & St. R’y P. Co., April 16,1881. noon. v. and each them is of hereby these authorized sell Having been I thirty gentlemen, in the are towns trust, confidence is Report, of its done the all Co., 21 Minnesota existence to most of time that Severson up for five actuated me. 22 M. 315, in days him in St. L. R’y years your A Co., Sept. office was 29, 1881. the of the Secretary Monday, v. of page state and their on Inspired and both property franchises day night, children' misplaced. convey and the caring I confess that to for not confidence has Bergeson two of 23 M. making L. this A St. R’y Co., Oct. for the and 12,1881. taxation which the of the of my extraordinarily v. lands of that more cause make said first named to progress of We generous concession. statements. of whom is dangerously with ambition such terms ill deserve high company, sure upon our one with to Perry diphtheria as me an 21 M. A St. L. R’y 1 your Co., Dec. 6, 4881. v. than Had humanity he successfully other be agreed that read the resisted. party by the whole it of his respective of entirely as’ FIVE boards unfit opinion of any ever ACTS may upon don’t to write fitness and capacity OF harm hair company was INTEREST HIS want to Mr. to Delp IN THE C. Wilson’s am at kngth A N. of such mv 25 C. M. you A St. P. R’y 1 serve you Co., Jan. 1882. 16, one v. . directors said of companies, people would desire hearers and existed. We make the the this will to the might have of district in If Minnesota W, to question State not here to how Herrick of attempt so as of it & Judge that 26 M. A St. St. P. R’y upon Wilson’s * L. R’y Co., March congress. 1882. head. There 9, v. seen found the v. only was we and franchises of the property last original action named wishes in W. concerning the this shall be gratified R. Plainview it R, respect FOUGHT THROUGH BY HIM Sharp M. compa your 27 A R’y Railroad the St. L. Co., March its history recount achievements. attorneys for the 11,1882. Co., 472, its towns Minn., being glorious v. 21 met him similar fully or bill. Original bills page and nies, of each of them, kept by a not You will will be part of the remember that the C. property desire life a of deserve are to Clark M Co., March supreme P. R’y after 28 A St. 14,1882. very soon the my v. They supreme half But there all action within lands of to the said the and franchises of the Ainona tax A generosity Railroad way. and are St. Peter had decided retain the memory members who introduced court was approbation IN the no have this day them, law SESSION. to afterwards Letts C. M. company ONE SINGLE authorizing P. March you 29 A St. R’y Co., the 27,1882. expressed; v. Company be used and to operated bonds magnanimity voting b work by it under either of living, and in whatever and form petition be side. I hereafter the ground that they had mariy will The forever to Lang B.C. been >r R. N. R’y :> on 30 A Co., April 1882. now unconstitutional, maters 14, may on electioneering v. documents; conveyed use as its charter. that Judge W ilson however far from be nominated this I shall spot Turn M. R’y was for admitted in enw^re, A L. April 31 St. Co., and elected the the brightest in stipulation 14^1882. the historv of rv. to other parties. -The,district all court pages our j^either they permitted were Sec. The Winona & St. Peter to ca^red 2. Railroad Com,, out of v^M. R'y to the house of in the performance duty, are of pass representatives. untviv*Ced Hanf Very «2 AC. my M. A St. P. Co., April early in susceptible of positive country. held that thejnwere taxable proof, and Mr. is hereby it Wilson authorized is khe and the soul will fondly SETTING^TRAFS empowered issue he and turn to pany to capitol. We introduced there found session 11«18#. good the original bill ever for old allowing no his friends you, the a . the tthWTeciillectiaus its capital paying necessur?eto of thing, past. The Democratic stock amount mak<y Winona & Peter in aaoniations * to bt. rwilioad such far thfr this incommon Lov. decision party- after 33 C. to purchase to avoid m. & N RvrvrTc; rmfip, curtain H. T». y bill, endorsed by J. R. Howard, cases, /. chief r and 1 complete the T’nrohW*' aforesaid. brta<fiieß; ' Redwood ti.e onsirnetionista Falls, Zumbrota she the role w useless Chatfield of work^o£takingj^>luminous for C early 1 tes- of 8., audS.P.Jejinison,secretary and ^ing f '« ‘hitnview e roads, that this would nut