Old News

St. Cloud register (St. Cloud, Minn.) 1938-1955

November 26, 1954 · Page 3 of 6

Page 3

Click image for full resolution

OCR Text

’Tt‘fi'.““-’*'“ ‘ 1,. , ‘l' . 7| ICLdUD November 26, 1954 Friday, REGISTER THE ST. Different? Is But This By REVEREND _ BIELEJESKI J. DIRECTOR r' ‘OF CATHOLIC CHARITIES , ‘Fiddl, Fidle! Fiddle, \ . Arrives .9 Tommy ". Our I story regarding the plans news on page one of the various K. of C. councils in the diocese to “Daddy” This the third from the is in my” (NOTE: bedrooms, big double and and con- to a tinue the speakers’ bureau of articles writfien by of laymen series quite who bed will address Tommy for first minute, set a. uncon- was our up by adoption. To- parents five he and Nancy. He be It seemed adult would al- sciously. and children’s the vocations sister- to ex—. groups on tall they what Tommy’s day and felt would be here four and have most pected to 718 hood no again that the of the diocese take ' proves can men arrival them and to meant to immediately. , clothing home with him. right at active in the part work of the Church under the an Nancy.) ~ And extremely excited all began so an Nancy t‘o '11! . direction of the Bishop. This is real Catholic Action. Nancy "along shopping went “Mommy” y” "Dad and u OF CHIEF ONE OUR There those who seek find tell what would to to be suit- are may us heard Tommy ‘do' an excuse she soon as , stumbling- blocks in deciding able for lay for Tommy. Pink-striped inactivity in the recent warning had given by the she 'it. Since knew we the adopt children to flannel was become size re— would ' Holy otherhomo been her Father of against false idea ‘ of the “priesthood out a W",,..-.—.--‘.._“_ mote possibility having of our {four ajamas, and there only short while she was before a. of the laity.” To do this is .3 f to do injustice the to children. an \own ittle shirts, pile of under- neat had felt it to not came us, We thinking of the Pope. The Holy Father, Since had present both we come pants, nd stockings as- for she call that a wise to suggest his from large families, well vision predecessors, has Nancy encouraged the to and our as arrange many “Daddy.” re- “Mommy” and us pictured’ ... of family had 12 a in faithful of the little to co-operate in the spreading of the work arrange When first one Nancy to came children, and be to content dresser drawers. so she greatly have been of Christ. They have must stated times that this is us, inany with unthink- fig“? two Tommy one or was arrived Dec. 29 troubled and emotionally dis- on ,not the privilege of few but the responsibility of able. a If going to we o’clock the were 6 in evening. at turbed. evening, That first she Christians. i all adopt, least wanted at: Mrs. .we nu." Hunstiger brought him J. had been bed- exhausted at . a, s four. l. in, sleepy little bear brown The Pope time did not and soft, condemn, against, the a . .‘6. was warm, a 2...». or warn adlead I. But, looked with little wooden train sleeply little bundle. we a as participation un~ of the laity in the work of the Hierarchy. "73-le der who I the his down long said, “Lo arm, years, we won- After her had tucked in He against warned those we Who that the laity assert can ‘Daddy,” dered with about problem and the of particu- no and kissed her goodnight, we 2 offer the Sacrifice of the Mass in the that they lar show ., rearing four totally of looked unrelated emotion the sense We“ stood for minuteslooking at situafilon With 'bed- Nancy .‘Iiterally co—consecrators the priest. with upstairs teen-agar: are the little dark head the pil- over. on children for swooped him. and down- low thanking The and God this of rooms for di0cese that beginning upon to men - our are see . for I his stairs warmed for particular child blessed he had parents. some soup they capable of doing things help in the to are many When Nancy asked and she when took him the with. She fell to asleep supper us soon k of the Church. another For had. We her some reason or we brothers kitchen fierce, and Such and with sisters to eat. also retired the were we a allowed the idea become that “church to accepted coming, the jiilylfdul quick thought that had exchange information for of the reason we a place. compelling took “belongs there that that to the women’s world. The sent i c urgency wor no one success . what Children’s understood to the Home they said. Nancy's Nightmare us of t projects adopted ‘by various on men’s e groups—— 1 that particular We somehow it day in felt early that was sleep But to everything from not the promotion to we were sausage suppers December indecent suddenly clear. for listen in. to was us undisturbed night. that A. of vocations—~proves that they in Church have place We felt God Their a had directly conversation very was sharp, ,wild in the middlj so cry life and activity both theparish diocesan and the answered personal and they in- on our of rushing prayers. the night were so sent t us It only seemed each other that evels. need pick tent it her This the fir we on ‘ was room. was the little sisters two sacred, and'two speak. We felt wiveI: to of of nightmares out Perhaps so the of of workers many some our, men little brothers like would like eavesdroppers and which had comfort her. to we were a we be bit disdainfulof the capabilities of their may a if little willing embarrassed take to went we were and Shev so we shook with fright Those of who home and announce spouses. four_child-ren you come in off the in— living left and to one sobbed‘ hoped year, had she room we as that going speak vocations the sister- stead of to to child them each alone. you are would again.‘We held on one year never \ for Friendly four Later Lad hood find that the her, little find loved her, rocked and to years. her, we were may woman seems find to that had God enlarged talked softly her. Gradually to Tommy tyhis humorous the boy of and the “what? sort take with was may news a , plan! she relaxed and fell into quiet on our likes sight. 'He had a man ou!” on Hasty Preparations sleep. But the night it next fine, football shoulders square happ If this home, in not feel abused. do the ns your The was same. day telephone next and level, friendly look in a. a The Just first night Tommy after remember the t of of wOrld’s most story call Children’s the his e one to Home Unlike Nancy who eyes. they bed and be- went to came, famous violinists. It that with world assured that concerts, had could have literally leaped into us we seems our and talk fast just to gan as Nancy’s little brother: Tom—, hearts, Tommy eased slowly in philharm’onic. and symphony soloist guest appearances, earnestly earlier they had as and arrangements comfortably. my, as soon as his‘income what he ' not, few made in tax the question- she in evening, a errors re- could be made him to He began get to play with \to he This questioned ing, answering. went turns. When investi- his wife by the was Nancy immediately. us. He - en— and then for about hour on an the gators from Bureau of Internal Revenue, she The carefully little joyed the was prepared Christmas but tree, they asleep. Nnncy’s fell It was single bed asked whether deliber‘ moved into she thought these " seemed little disappointed was up errors were a first night without night— a . the that attic empty would that he had ’tricky missed “Santa. and whether 'guilty of ate he might have been and Tommy slept sweét- mare, need be finished quickly in— to Clause.” Wad/idiom He “Mom- called Iy and peacefully. us bookkeeping. “That ' “Bookkeeping?” she replied. man ‘I- l do is_ can’t keep‘ books anything else. -All he b can or Headache fiddle, fiddle, fiddle!” K: '- ‘ Chinese. May Moscow Have A to decide her You certainly helped wife r vo- your . cation, helpthe Divine Bride- and do hesitate GOOD not to WHAT’S so NEWS IN THE J. Gilbert of Christ. brides By J. to potential to. groom propose / Peking Communists the “Soviet-Communist" point of IF YOU. PIECE TO- or Rev. ROGER l. VOSSBERG ' c “.The Bishops ’ Meet, Nationalist Chinese there is view, because ten- cther various things thatldif- govern— a , ‘ Chiang Kai-shek Vvill of - of ment the part dency top people of .erent author- on some the‘struggle triumph in for that Communists hold ity China have to said and written in The Bishops Speak control China.’ of ' inherit directly from BEST they OF NEWS—N0 weeks, backs. recent signs " The TRIPLE CATHOLICS you can come — do they not that Lenin, and with the impression Wary Peking that, of up ' that is, hope the We right. of population Catholic Formosa snow yet, experlr as we go are the Malenkov and ,Soviet need Russia has problem pres- Bishops of the this the a decide As is being written, Peking push ‘promise that! to Cannot the may alto hope 1V9 profit: tripled during to almost the has press. any- Russia past rulers of its hands ent in Red China. ‘ men- as on forward with its aggression, to United States their gathered in Washington for after thing that! and are of with prorperily buriu‘em 12,944 links the will from past. rising six tors, as, or to years, T problem, of ‘show people, these “over- and e as now, meeting. annual When will read this, the meeting point he So- Observers to overflow you into the home: of the 32,550. ’I‘ * fi‘ that Peking Chinese,” especially, is who ’ 'ay, not seas any Port withdrawal from viet have been of the concluded and the statement annual break from Moscow boss. it'takes is If that action, and that limi- big SHOULD I955 BE,,GOOD—— for may year away wage Increase earner, ending back the handing Arthur, the to American. Moscow Hierarchy have released, against it. It rather, lose permanently will been in, turn may or and industry will be busi- From Soviet in four ueJI Adult 1954, China of " assets gener- .June, 8,887. a con- was that the Russian Red: its domination of Peking, and, not I, It imagine is difficult for that not may to their as in me contribu/iom Soviet-Chinese the mixed scand- of compa- am to for 6,085 accounted versions be able make the Chinese the anti-Corfu time, at to same write this the Oxnams, Blanchards, Holdriges of and 1951, in 1950 and nies set Church and of charity. up Reds behave precisely munists in Asia.- might they show baptized £411.ch Infants “numbfr. that as Kazakh- of the building the the the of the anti POAU, and the latest country, important them behave. gains. l want to for :1- as a: accounted and immigration Railway, and stan-Sinkiang sit- It has been said Catholic diatribe tribe, George 'Elderk'in, than W. more are Moscow guide, is anxious second- to NO (THIRD assuaging WORLD WAR similar the er moves as rest. lately that Moscow be- of once ting with their yellow sheets pencils poised if control, Peking, and stéps not best at over of Moscow. the part lit- —British historian Arnold on J. lieves it year, a should Red and push freedom not Gii'cm iii 1'qu cheap possible. price [he a waiting is they hear what said that to a: a paper, can believed so The problem Toynbce is better tle to China than into does of acts third .Telf-.rucrificiug any more It has [extended long-term not expect and a zed/our clergy life phrases and twist Peking, and of context that be- sentences out lie fact the in aggression this time, The at but this world would ruble credit China. that involve the year to war Church religiour, the Cut/Jolie ul- make Com- lieving able it is to their the seizure ‘Tibet, pointed calculated tO’make of it is meanings in 'that a manner But Pe‘king knows the quite United States and Russia. diheult/aful not as for itself, growth. decision: munist .r/aouu bad had extremely out, - mzy: Bishops’ the reper- meeting sinister take plot «to involved small' when in over a rum ood 1953, Speaking decide that going in Philadelphia, it is he to cussions as Sei'e;al in India, and Moscow may Benedictine from Sifter: compared the that to amount _ country. t what thinks best, do it 3 predict not . has fear that said goinern- to that . he the reason any Great Britain work- spends annually expccrs present the Cloud St. Dioceie are who will people Unfortunately, there what Moscow wants. aggression this“ many are at more open "cold between develop colonies. war" it: Some- and ment the West economists. to I energetically ing. in Formom read Again unfortun- time flip considerable persuade what these write. might Peking might paranoiacs .And a thing like one-fourth, The said one they Russia "for » continue long au- experts expect to a # * * Asian number of potential itself that oughtto continue it Bishops’ ately, people will read the thority not said. message. many the gradual economic improve time” with "sensational Communists into the pointed Ii- It is CARDS—A be aggressive. no CHRISTMAS to over pro- And it could be“ that Red non-Catholics. This holds well of Catholics so true as as started that last VVest Camp. that there cnding."‘ by authorities month ment out to China is unalloyed card project not turgical Christmas an slight The have that result is net Assuoging Steps large of‘ “over- ‘may- a numbers even you continue without serious Toyuhe'e'r comfort Moscow. chpile predic- are Mr. to any scr- of in started by women group a meddle places suspicion Hierarchy does Chinese” that the American in various have said,‘ Right-now, seas tion, hope some there be will devel- we has a reu- Detroit Asia, outside of China. in it- @WW.§W¢ ago two years within movement in and there Moscow is politics. that is secret trying push\ not to a mtioual ending cold the self. to business booming oped war. into China, Red but guide it to a c0ntrol of the country._ the Church political ac- take to over. The ending, .remaiioual of well cording Soviet-Communist These Chinese, of vol- courie, dozens to keeps that as as a Essay Dog women of untruth. this is sort There defense against a yioulzl in- he watching point of view. other Asians, PEACE. on a are busy. unteers it because difficult for is defense but t simple some the Emphasis tently whether is the to put upon see 5* 1K ’I‘ ’ v .lloSéph~ by istartecl The project mouth. using one’s head before consists in using one’s was By Brefig DOCTORS MUST BELIEVE ‘ Detroit living in the Before informed and must speak be area we must Around women the Parish we we —-Any doctor "who lacks faith in ' of Manhattanv alumnae who MY WIFE GOT ME ON impression, inform them- however, Catholics millions of think. When that I ' are - am our Supreme the‘ Being has right no the office the phone and Y. anti-dog. at On the N. College in Purchase, I ville contrary, the. through Church of the about the affairs selves practicc".medicinc," declared as‘ked’, “How to truly‘ pro-dog, which is many prayers am from sales Proceeds the and informed and, being to- Catholic reading of the go press, saying that have been something Dr. Elmer president-elect that Hess, dog-lov- we you many alma their scholarships ward their thoughts,. having voice thinking, give to done at would rid some get not. ’ of American ers are Medical the Associ- _ Church will not ‘ of the dog?” accusations against the these false Being truly pro-dog, I mater. ' . con— ation, I had not sider dog's. dog. Some folks ' name legion. 7 guru/lu- is be to survive. Our college able a There _ ' women "A physician walks into who b saying behave if dog'were hu— e on as a a . with" birth thinking, based Straight your hilliug experience own lit/0~ on uler are have sick said being, is nonalonc,” kind any. man or even some a room .ra-lelof- the in the to Church, give [be the Bowling accusa- answer impor- you .rloue: can of super-human being. one m or e Dr. Hess. minister "He only can Answer meddling politics. card: that that in things the Church is tion tant Clariitmuil to Such religiour people, I contend, are- rhe‘,_ailing with the to person ma- for. And anti-dog, though should be picture they the whole the just question and pray the meaning even give to true one tools of scientific terial medicine anyhow, the consider themselves dog- great howyou told Church the mul prouidiug Has of Chrirl clear to Birthday you ever you. children would faith lovers. ——his in higher chap A who really likes power a for vote? 'eclucutiou to Catholic college are against dog, likes a it dog, be- pray does rest." a. the as a Catholic the r vote such thing there If caialidute. wort/9y and the it is as dog. ‘ were me, a cause Jame a includ— uuu' More men women, children would practically able control .in be this would to ar‘ country other In wordn, fruly we nit at your ing Catholici, .r/aould have the win. :ABOUT WARNS political seeking pro-dog Hierarchy like: the ‘doggi- election. If the were STRIKES man every Word Check why Ialh pub- [but in to courage of dogs. does He they first thing not try nest the United States, of the control strike right ;—'Workers have I to did lic life. dodge mention all Why the truth? not that a to pretend that dog is to a some- editorial Catholic An establish‘a vote. would do isto wife, however. face of unjust Instead, in I thing the other than treatment my dog. He a * ’I‘ ’k “What Visitor asks, Sunday Our in issue of the Nov. 14 played little trick her that likes but the dog for being conditions, dog. working a bad on a or DR. HESS AGAIN—The I have learned from observing regard? The this in A grdvc reveal self-styled elections Nov. 2 did. the great ‘ all its many with "strike action, .on AMA her=and president-elect other said the dog-lovers, however, do women. for not telling have been elections fact that old years be only should ‘ repercussions: same Have noticed that like dogs all. They like medical you ever schools in this at country truth and the learn pbrSons who really: want to to taken all are when last practically themselves, resort and they - women like what never as a an- of doing fine job "teach- there are a that Thqtufact is their prejudices._ guided by not direct question, except dogs of settlement have for' do their swer a other can means egos. fundamentals of scientific ing the another, by asking by Catholic is such thing vote. or That kind of dog-lover failed.” as no a . medicine,” but added, "I'm changing he the subject, by _ got conclusively . or this sentil’ Visitor proved sometimes is Simday droolineg “Om- in from Cars advice This i’ng off tangent? at afraid concentration came that the a about mental his (or her) dog. on 1952. Inv 1948 and of Presidential election the years l have idea that Griffin, Arch- Bernard dinal an women Sometimes he basic is brutally science is that the over- so great and readers conducted polls those do this avoid committing our among to years we Speaking of Westminster. bearing bishop it. Either toward way, teaching of spiritual values is al- l themselvel. Catholics do vote A always not that conclusively proved as a woman he attached the to England, ' the grows of strikes in so neglected.” recent like: leave herself "on out." most to American citizens other simply but if united dog that, anything happens as group "one workers told that Cardinal I with sympathize lawyers who The teaching of i'uluer .rpiriluul it, he he had to if lost their acts influenced by all Their votes at do. not as re- are have question conclusion in that the to cannot‘ women mall)! his 175 neglected escape wife, daugh- in man? .rlate or son, and a or a beliefs economic their political ligion by but or court. ' de— some least occasions the ter. and at univerxitier college! there 1 on ASSISTANT DAeToe THE Be that I did it preferences. not as may, . been strike has cision call As for I myself, be try to MOTTO To THINKTHE Became dairy. fact, to clunrroomi In in a wife’s I question. . of Catholics 107726 percentage ~ of polls the answer my “In each the l truly pro-dog. I Lady CLUB want YOUTH THE NEW to prematurely." OF taken back— shot her: not inritual only ualuet at exactly are ne- Republican Democratic and "NEVER who voted be 4111 THE“ dog, counterfeit not, was WILL er: V a a “What’s happened? Has reufiouiihili/ie! Labor liar glected undermined but directly u! MEET. polit- SHALL human. \TWAIN by those with polled of votes line the percentage ' Lady- herself hit by got agau- labor and rig/m, wire «tell and attached. uu. Record Straight at parties.” tomobile?” ical urhiug their before officiulr, ion if '1‘ it ~ wife promptly My crossed _ v when in 1928 that know interest to also of It is is.not After all, she lady. a weigh .1 will Instead» of" Jtrihe, evading, memberi/Jip LESS PERSECUTION—Tlie me up. to Bishop She is I Presidency, dog. do mind the the for not nominated Al Smith was a no direct she de- of J'qu me by'Pius gave a answer. about-l the all of persecution Catholic children being fanciful the XII Catholic standctaken in a firm comequcncex the and well his supported actively open campaign. have been upset, .paper She must or or her. They call her into Prin- Jtrihe before ii ciiimz slacked Church in Romania can has to would those who. go weeks against several his address a made charges of false hundreds have done that. the would she not They did ago ansyver for all I But in this cess, care. éffecI. off in the three months, religious” “strictly ‘ said: of Bishops to She the authority limit polit- past ac- there Smith, but Church and the against no was muddled world, someb‘od _. . broke her leash She * * “No. t cording NCWC “its founda- law, all natural he declared, As matters. to burden an news re- of the behalf. must in his ical activity assume ' she’s We’ve searched and UP—Thc . . , one. CADILLACS GO from lease Vienna. The lessening application far keeping the straight, record of interpretation, and its as' its 0.8..V. tion, the _ brought out so interest of Another point in neig borhood, and the ‘ we General Mo— insisting that of things What division of Cadillac ligious persecution is partic~ of authority are'within the are extend" moral aspects annual meeting ularTy the 1927‘ ‘ 1918 her.” is that from to can’t find editorial they that reality is and price Week are, announced last ’ noticeable in R0- the a that I home Church. When the got tors the during Washington eve- Bishops in took place of the what it is. for models principles $43 all of neighbor had just tele- increase ning, manian countryside. God by given application of the on The a Smith which _ in the that,‘you call 1928, For October. In month of me year can back phoned. Lady in of was this IIV/Jut in. 1935. is daily lives their of in anti-dog if please._I the conduct 16”)“ to mcam mid-Novem- moved to you con— , Presidency, it men for the govern up was Betty, Our daughter, yard. ran was that uh that tend I simply Ilie future hard The predict. 1V umzouizcemeul is 1116 the of religion, part of am pro- It is part politics. to the not accusation that possible a avoid beaming, in order a her to going the door. out any human. plum change load have seldom .roftlacurlcd Real; become things man.’ On such our to betwleen God and relationship home. bring the dog have They politics. to discuss Hierarchy meeting to was As I Chesterton remarked, the imme- “min that about for but JGlflJ/f) and ulterior the their fail in duty speak Bishops new the must Dog-Lovers elections. auy the since—after as November like in or long met dog nobody ever a to as diate future! motii'cl. of souls. Shepherds the. mark leave spells1 backward. politics, want'to it ' but 1 do meddle in not Church does not The 1 .~ i n l